Defaults.Exposed

Defaults.ExposedResearch › Domain Exposure by TLD

Domain Exposure by TLD

Data as of 2026-07-28 · 112 TLDs · "spoofable" = lacks an enforcing DMARC policy (`quarantine`/`reject`). Aggregate only.

Across the whole census, 88.2% of domains can be impersonated in email, 10% accept mail with no authentication at all, and 8.5% have none of the five core protections. Here's how top-level domains compare — lower is better.

Least exposed TLDs

#TLDDomainsSpoofableMail, no authFully exposed
1.ch1,409,98366.8%7%0.5%
2.ai892,69470.2%4.7%4.1%
3.nl3,027,67670.4%6.9%0.5%
4.pl1,658,19971.2%3.2%0.5%
5.email106,87575.9%10.5%11%
6.in2,421,23277.7%4.9%3.7%
7.de8,535,45778.1%8.4%1.2%
8.vip1,158,19178.8%0.9%12.2%
9.no488,54280%14.5%0.5%
10.dk655,29080.4%28.1%0.4%
11.co2,254,60180.7%9.1%6.7%
12.sk287,02881.7%7%0.9%
13.studio171,57981.8%10.2%8.1%
14.eu1,586,75682%12%1.8%
15.gr370,34482.1%3.9%0.6%

Most exposed TLDs

#TLDDomainsSpoofableMail, no authFully exposed
1.xn--p1ai355,62498.9%5.6%2.6%
2.cyou255,58298.8%4%11.7%
3.cfd299,15498.7%1.7%5%
4.cn2,417,23698.5%2.1%5.4%
5.kr400,25998.2%9.1%3.2%
6.icu243,62098.2%9.3%16.6%
7.sbs534,34997.9%1.8%6.8%
8.lol334,95997.5%2%8.1%
9.bond126,14797.4%1.3%14.9%
10.ru2,952,31896.9%8.2%2.7%
11.vn322,45895.9%17.1%8.1%
12.cc1,255,03495.6%1.5%6%
13.ua300,98295.3%17.7%1.8%
14.buzz152,86695.3%3.7%2.7%
15.bet146,40295%1.7%5%

"Spoofable" = share of domains with no enforcing DMARC policy, so the visible "From" address can be forged. "Mail, no auth" = has MX records but no working SPF/DMARC. "Fully exposed" = zero of five core protections (SPF, enforced DMARC, DNSSEC, HTTPS, HSTS).

Averages don't tell you about your domain. Check yours free → — owner-only, with exactly what to fix.

By country · By industry · By TLD · The exposure score → · Can someone spoof your domain? →