Defaults.Exposed

Defaults.ExposedSeptember 2026 census › v10 registry

Methodology v10: the 34-check registry

Methodology v10 · 34 checks (25 scored + 9 informational) · census as of September 5, 2026

This is the versioned, citable registry of every check in the Defaults.Exposed grading methodology. Each check has a permanent canonical ID and a stable URL, cite /v10/methodology/<check-id> and it will keep meaning the same thing. Prevalence figures are computed from the census of 316,600,902 graded domains in the September 2026 edition and are pinned to it; the check definitions are frozen for v10.

Machine-readable: /v10/methodology/checks.json · Headline statistics: /v10/data · Licence: open data · The edition these figures come from: September 2026 census →

How checks become a grade

25 of the 34 checks carry points; 9 are informational and never move the grade. Every check returns pass, fail, or N/A — the no-data rule: when a check couldn't be determined (timeout, SERVFAIL, redacted source) it is excluded from that domain's scoring denominator rather than counted as a failure. "Determined absent" (no DMARC record, no HTTPS) is a real fail. Grade bands are locked for comparability: A+ ≥ 95% · A ≥ 90% · B ≥ 80% · C ≥ 70% · D ≥ 60% · F below 60%.

Email Security

Canonical ID Check Grade impact Census prevalence (as of September 5, 2026) Fix guide
spf-exists SPF record Scored 46.4% of graded domains publish a syntactically valid SPF record /fix/spf
spf-policy-strength SPF policy strength Scored 18.2% of graded domains publish SPF with a hardfail (-all) policy /fix/spf
dmarc-policy DMARC policy Scored 11.6% of graded domains publish an enforcing DMARC policy (p=quarantine or p=reject) /fix/dmarc
dmarc-reporting DMARC reporting Scored 9.80% of graded domains publish a DMARC record with an aggregate-reporting (rua) address /fix/dmarc
dkim-exists DKIM Scored 50.1% of domains where a DKIM selector could be determined publish one /fix/dkim
mx-record MX records Scored 54.7% of graded domains publish at least one MX record /fix/mx
reverse-dns Reverse DNS (PTR) Scored 77.8% of domains with a mail-relevant address have a PTR (reverse DNS) record /fix/reverse-dns

TLS & Certificates

Canonical ID Check Grade impact Census prevalence (as of September 5, 2026) Fix guide
https-available HTTPS available Scored 67.0% of graded domains serve over HTTPS /fix/https
cert-valid Certificate valid Scored 89.1% of HTTPS-serving domains present a valid, trusted certificate /fix/certificate
cert-expiry-warning Certificate expiry Scored not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/certificate
cert-signature-algorithm Signature algorithm Scored not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/certificate
cert-key-strength Key strength Scored not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/certificate
tls-version TLS version Scored 100.0% of HTTPS-serving domains negotiate TLS 1.2 or 1.3 /fix/tls
cipher-strength Cipher strength Scored not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/tls
tls-compression TLS compression Informational not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/tls
ocsp-stapling OCSP stapling Informational not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/tls
secure-renegotiation Secure renegotiation Informational not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/tls

Web Security

Canonical ID Check Grade impact Census prevalence (as of September 5, 2026) Fix guide
hsts-header HSTS Scored 21.1% of HTTPS-serving domains send an HSTS header /fix/hsts
http-to-https-redirect HTTP→HTTPS redirect Scored not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/https
csp-header Content-Security-Policy Scored 10.1% of graded domains send an effective Content-Security-Policy header /fix/csp
x-frame-options Clickjacking protection Scored 15.3% of graded domains send clickjacking protection (X-Frame-Options or CSP frame-ancestors) /fix/clickjacking
x-content-type-options MIME-sniffing protection Scored 17.8% of graded domains send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff /fix/mime-sniffing
referrer-policy Referrer-Policy Scored 7.91% of graded domains send a Referrer-Policy header /fix/referrer-policy
coop-header COOP (Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy) Informational not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/cross-origin-headers
corp-header CORP (Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy) Informational not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/cross-origin-headers
coep-header COEP (Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy) Informational not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/cross-origin-headers

DNS Security

Canonical ID Check Grade impact Census prevalence (as of September 5, 2026) Fix guide
caa-record CAA records Scored 1.38% of graded domains publish a CAA record /fix/caa
dnssec-ds DNSSEC (DS) Scored 6.86% of graded domains have a valid, fully validating DNSSEC chain /fix/dnssec
dnssec-dnskey DNSSEC (DNSKEY) Scored 6.86% of graded domains have a valid, fully validating DNSSEC chain /fix/dnssec
nameserver-diversity Nameserver diversity Scored not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/nameservers
soa-configuration SOA configuration Scored not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/nameservers
ipv6-support IPv6 support Informational 21.8% of graded domains publish an AAAA (IPv6) record /fix/ipv6

Infrastructure

Canonical ID Check Grade impact Census prevalence (as of September 5, 2026) Fix guide
cdn-waf-detection CDN / WAF detection Informational not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/infrastructure
hosting-provider Hosting provider Informational not published per-check in the census rollup /fix/infrastructure

Cite this registry

Check definitions are stable for methodology v10 and the prevalence figures are pinned to the September 2026 census. Please cite Defaults.Exposed and link the check's stable URL.

Defaults.Exposed, "Grading Methodology v10" (census as of September 5, 2026). https://defaults.exposed/v10/methodology

Permalink: https://defaults.exposed/v10/methodology · Machine-readable: /v10/methodology/checks.json · Per-check anchors: https://defaults.exposed/v10/methodology/<check-id>

Prevalence numbers are aggregates across the whole census, never a named third party's result. This edition is pinned; the next census publishes its own registry.